I suspect it would help some, but that probably wouldn’t matter that much for people who aren’t recoil sensitive.Īnd while the proprietary sight is … interesting … I don’t think that it was that great. Whether it actually helps with control/muzzle flip, well, you’d have to compare head-to-head with a non-ported barrel to see. And stepping down from about a 3″ barrel to about a 2″ one isn’t a good idea, if you want all the power the gun could deliver. Our research has shown that it effectively makes the ballistic performance that of a barrel the length before the ports. If it’s a deal-breaker for you, then get something other than the SAS (Sig offers a version of the P365 with a manual safety, or you can just go with another brand.) I’m not at all troubled by the lack of a manual safety, though that has been an issue for other people. And clearly the point & click ergonomics are very good. Quite good trigger, somewhat lighter than I expected. 10+1 rounds of 9mm +P is damned nice to have in such a small package. Surprisingly comfortable even in my very large hands. I agree with most of the reviews I’ve read of the P365 generally: very small, well designed and well made (at least in the later guns, after Sig resolved some minor but real issues). But does mean that at least in my hands it was more than adequate for the job, right out of the box.īut what did I actually think of the gun? Which doesn’t mean that it is the ultimate CCW. I didn’t even try to use the proprietary sighting system. Draw from a low ready position, intuitive point and shoot as fast as I could, at about 5 yards. Yup, it’s the latest iteration of the popular Sig P365, the SAS (“Sig Anti-Snag”), designed to be the ‘ultimate concealed-carry gun’.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |